How to chose the cycle of convergence

Home Forums Running & Solving How to chose the cycle of convergence

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #287
    Edwin ArroyoEdwin Arroyo
    Participant

    In fact, i read the topic of case convergence, and i tried to understand this statement

    ( You have to check the different average results and to choose the cycle when variation of the different parameter versus the cycles you consider that it is very low.)

    does it mean for example that i run a model for 100 cycles, then i got file caled MED which containe average values of each cycle, but to chose the ceycle of convergence, i take values of parameter which i study and find the mean of it between these 100 cyles and then plot this average, and find the cycle which is near to this average.

    Is this right meaning of the statement which is not clear?

    #410
    Carlo CaligiuriCarlo Caligiuri
    Participant

    Last question one may thought before running a simulation would be: “How many cycles should I let the simulation run?”. Well, the simple answer is: “It depends”. In fact, it depends on a lot of things: engine type (turbocharged engine usuially need more time for getting a steady solution (convergency)), engine geometry (the ratio between engine displacement vs. intake and exhaust manifold sizes), flow initial conditions (if they are close to the final solution, the number of cycles needed for a converged solution is lower).
    Here you’ll find some hints on how to choose the number of cycles a simulation should run in order to get a good solution (I’m assuming it is an engine steady running condition what you want to run, not an engine transient behavior):

    • First time I run a simulation I use 100 cycles. OK, the simulation will take a lot of time but it is only one simulation.[/*:1vssc5ki]
    • I always check the averaged air mass flow in the first intake duct and in the last exhaust duct (the comparison is simple: intake-mass + fuel = exhaust-mass). These values can be seen in the MED.DAT file but you have to include them before running the simulation. If the previous equation does not fit, do not blame the code, it means that intake or exhaust manifold flow conditions are not steady yet.[/*:1vssc5ki]
    • Another way to see if the solution has converged is to check if averaged pressure values in different engine locations have achieved a steady evolution.[/*:1vssc5ki]
    • If the engine is turbocharged, it is good to check and compare the average turbine and compressor work (in the MED file; again be sure to include them before running the simulation). Both works should be very similar (in pure theory they should be equal). If turbine work is greater/lower than compressor work you should detect that the turbo speed is increasing/decreasing. So turbo speed is also a good variable to check if a simulation has converged.[/*:1vssc5ki]
    • Finally, you have to decide in which cycle the previous comments are well satisfied and choose it as a good value for the number of cycles. For example, I’ve attatched a plot containing intake and exhaust mass flows and it is observed that 20 cycles is enough for arriving to converge.[/*:1vssc5ki]
    • Remember that a number of cycles which is appropriate for a given engine running condition may not be good for another one (mainly when changing engine speed or turbocharger operation).[/*:1vssc5ki]
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.